On a spring day in April 1996, a lone gunman wielding powerful firearms killed 35 people in the Tasmanian tourist destination of Port Arthur.
That massacre nearly thirty years ago, which ushered in some of the toughest weapons policies in the world, can feel like a bygone age for many residents.
However, the Bondi Beach attack this past Sunday, which resulted in 15 fatalities, has brought back painful recollections of the Tasmanian tragedy.
A recent report revealed that there are now in excess of four million weapons owned by civilians across the country – a figure that is roughly two times the amount from about 20 years ago.
This equates to approximately a weapon for each small group of people.
While Queensland has the highest number of legal firearms, followed by New South Wales (NSW) and Victoria, it is the island state and the Northern Territory that have the most guns per person.
The data also dispels the common view that guns are mainly owned by people in regional areas.
Firearms are widespread in cities and their outskirts, with a significant portion located in population centres.
Critically, there are now firearms concentrated among fewer owners, with the average licence holder possessing more than four firearms.
Weapons legislation in Australia are inconsistent across the country, with a patchwork implementation of rules between different jurisdictions.
Typically, to secure a gun licence, an individual must be an adult, deemed a "responsible individual", pass a competency test, and provide a "valid purpose" for ownership.
The allowable purposes include hunting or culling, competitive shooting, certain occupational requirements, and for collections.
However, significant shortcomings remain. For instance, individuals under 18 in some jurisdictions can have use of a firearm from as young as early adolescence.
Following the Port Arthur massacre, a major rewrite of national gun laws was enacted, leading to a large-scale surrender scheme of over 650,000 firearms.
Rapid-fire weapons were banned, and background checks alongside delays for sales were introduced.
A key tenet of these reforms was the removal of "personal protection" as a justifiable cause for gun ownership.
In the hours following the Bondi shooting, political leaders were clear about the need to strengthen gun laws.
A national gun buyback scheme was announced, marking the largest such effort since 1996.
Other proposals now under consideration include:
There are also calls for periodic reassessments of existing licence holders, acknowledging that "situations evolve" over time.
These swift actions have met with opposition from some quarters.
Pro-gun advocates argue that restricting ownership would not have stopped an attack driven by extremist ideology.
They suggest that focus would be better spent improving intelligence rather than restricting lawful owners for the vast majority of licensed individuals.
Furthermore, a key proposed reform from 1996 – a country-wide gun database – remains unfinished, though it has now been listed as a urgent task.
For long-time advocates, the Bondi attack is a stark warning that regulations must keep pace with new threats.
They argue that modernisation is needed to "address deficiencies" and safeguard communities.
While mass shootings remain uncommon in Australia compared to some nations, the risk persists, and the legacy of firearms circulating illegally – through poor storage – continues to pose a danger.
As one advocate stated, "It's sad that it takes such a devastating event to prompt action and take notice."
Elara is a writer and life coach passionate about sharing stories of transformation and resilience.
News
By Dennis Henry
•
14 Aug 2026
News
By Dennis Henry
•
14 Aug 2026
News
By Dennis Henry
•
14 Aug 2026
News
By Dennis Henry
•
14 Aug 2026
News
By Dennis Henry
•
14 Aug 2026
News
By Dennis Henry
•
13 Aug 2026